# fn-69-evaluate-gemma-4-e2b-it-for-compact.3 Assess runtime fit and preset viability

## Description

Translate the benchmark result into a product recommendation.

Start here:

- task `.2` output
- `src/config/types.ts`
- `docs/CONFIGURATION.md`
- `website/features/benchmarks.md`

This task must answer:

- does Gemma 4 E2B-it fit the slim / slim-tuned lane in practice?
- is the GGUF footprint acceptable for that lane?
- is the latency acceptable for local answer generation?
- does it improve table/structured answer behavior enough to matter?
- if it is too large for slim, is it still a candidate for balanced/quality or
  only for custom/remote setups?

Required output:

- one explicit recommendation:
  - no-go
  - optional/custom model recommendation
  - shipped preset candidate
  - candidate for a larger preset lane only

## Acceptance

- [ ] The task produces an explicit preset-fit recommendation.
- [ ] Recommendation considers size and latency, not just answer quality.
- [ ] The result says whether Gemma fits slim/slim-tuned, another preset, or only custom/remote usage.

## Done summary

TBD

## Evidence

- Commits:
- Tests:
- PRs:
