---
artifact: prioritization-framework
version: "1.0"
created: <YYYY-MM-DD>
status: draft
---

# Prioritization: [Decision Context]

## Applicability Filter Summary
<!-- Which frameworks ran, which were excluded, and why. Note what would unlock an excluded framework. -->

- **Ran:** [e.g., RICE, ICE, MoSCoW]
- **Excluded:** [e.g., Kano - no customer research; Weighted Scoring - single criterion]

## Inputs Summary
<!-- What you were given. Flag any missing or assumed input. -->

[Item list and available data per item; note assumptions]

## Per-Framework Scoring

### RICE
<!-- Score = (Reach * Impact * Confidence) / Effort -->

| Item | Reach (users/qtr) | Impact (0.25-3) | Confidence (%) | Effort (eng-wk) | RICE Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Item A] | [N] | [0.25-3] | [%] | [N] | [score] | [note] |

### ICE
<!-- Score = Impact * Confidence * Ease, each 1-10 -->

| Item | Impact (1-10) | Confidence (1-10) | Ease (1-10) | ICE Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Item A] | [N] | [N] | [N] | [score] | [note] |

### MoSCoW

| Item | Bucket (Must/Should/Could/Won't) | Rationale | Risk if dropped |
|---|---|---|---|
| [Item A] | [Bucket] | [Why] | [Risk] |

<!-- Add Weighted Scoring and/or Kano tables here only if those frameworks passed the applicability filter. -->

## Per-Framework Ranking Output
<!-- For each scored framework, list items sorted high-to-low by score. With 5+ items, call out the top 5 and bottom 5 and name the score gap between them. (If the scoring tables above are already sorted, summarize the ranking here rather than repeating.) -->

- **RICE ranking:** [items sorted by score, high to low]
- **ICE ranking:** [items sorted by score, high to low]

## Cross-Framework Comparison
<!-- Rank position per item across frameworks. Explain every Divergent row by naming the driving dimension. -->

| Item | RICE rank | ICE rank | MoSCoW bucket | Agreement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| [Item A] | [1] | [1] | [Must] | [Strong] |
| [Item B] | [2] | [8] | [Should] | [Divergent - why] |

## Executive Summary with Recommendation
<!-- 3-5 sentences: what to prioritize, what to defer, what the key divergence means -->

[Recommendation]

## Sensitivity / What Changes the Ranking
<!-- 2-3 cases where the order flips, focused on items near the cut line -->

- [If Confidence on Item X is wrong, then ...]
- [If Effort on Item Y doubles, then ...]

## Recommendations (Sequencing)

- **Fund now:** [Items]
- **Defer / drop:** [Items]
- **Data that would change this:** [What to gather]

## Limitations and Biases
<!-- What the frameworks do NOT measure; where they could mislead -->

- [Limitation 1]
- [Limitation 2]
